Categories
Headlines University

USG discloses standing balances of different units

 

The University Student Government (USG) released the balances of its different units last March 14. Originally carried out in compliance of a Legislative Assembly (LA) resolution which called for the establishment of an Appropriations Fund System (AFS), the alleged untimely posting of the balances has received massive backlash online, calling into question both the legitimacy of the figures and the motives for posting while the USG General Elections (GE) are still underway.

DSC_2873

Following the bill

In order to shed more light on the matter, the Office of the Executive Treasurer (OTREAS) and the LA issued a joint statement last March 15, explaining that the balances released were part of an approved resolution and have been available via the USG website as early as March 8.

The resolution in question, which was passed last February 23, called for an AFS within the USG to help resolve the unused funds left over from the previous academic year. In the said resolution, it stated that once adopted, “an initial online publication of standing USG balances, and the appropriations manual shall be made available.” However, the resolution also stated that the system will only take effect 14 days after it is approved.

Responding to complaints on the accuracy of the post, the statement clarified that “the publication did not act as a financial report, but rather a documentary disclosure in compliance with the law; the obedience to which is upheld above all else regardless of any unrelated circumstances.”

Nevertheless, the statement admitted that the posted balances were outdated as these were the available figures as of March 3, but stressed that transactions must be processed through various administrative offices before they are reflected in the USG’s records.

 

False negatives

One of the main complaints in the post was the misattributed deficits of the Office of the Vice President for Internal Affairs (OVPIA) and the School of Economics Government (SEG). According to the unupdated balances, OVPIA was facing a debt of P119,670.44, while SEG had P24,057.60. However, as of the latest report from the Treasurer’s Assembly last March 15, both units no longer showed any losses.

In fact, the updated balance, which is posted on the USG website, showed that OVPIA has a current balance of P423,518.56, while SEG has a current balance of P75,492.40. The numbers originally reported show such a discrepancy to the actual balances that it put into question the untimely released report.

In response to the posted report, SEG clarified that the college government was not at a loss. They stated that they were still coordinating with OTREAS as payment deposits from the Economic Leaders Congress held in the previous term have yet to be declared which led to the negative balance.

Vice President for Internal Affairs and presidential candidate Pram Menghrajani said in her statement that the timing was suspicious, specifically because it was done on a Saturday evening after school offices have already closed. Further, she added that neither OTREAS nor the Commission on Audit (COA) were aware of the report released online.

“This brings into question the veracity of the report and which USG unit decided to publish it. Since it is an unofficial, unaudited and unupdated report, what was the purpose of coming up with such a statement other than to damage and malign the offices that have negative balances,” she said in her statement.

She also clarified with OTREAS that OVPIA indeed was not having a deficit. Rather, as she explained, the alleged debt in the office was a result of errors made in the books, specifically a double billing of a P165,000 expense incurred from a planner selling activity and a misattributed charge of P33,000.

Menghrajani reiterated that the information to be disclosed to the public should have been verified first in order to ensure that transparency and accountability in the USG is maintained. In this case, she stressed that OTREAS and COA should have approved the figures before such a release was made, and that supplementary details should be affixed in order to explain how such values arose.

“Let us all be vigilant because our freedoms can be abused by people with agendas or ambitions. True transparency should withstand scrutiny and must reflect fair play and impartiality,” she stated.

 

No motives?

USG president Carlo Inocencio said that although he was expecting publicity materials to be blasted in compliance with the resolution, he was not informed about the specific time and date of the blasting.

USG Executive Secretary Janel Tumpalan clarified that her office was responsible in making the publicity material of the account balances in fulfillment of the AFS. Tumpalan explained that since they had to comply with the 14-day disclosing of financial statements, they used the latest data available to them, which was the balance as of March 3.

As for the updated balances, Tumpalan said that they are still currently confirming the information with the OTREAS and would blast the updated balances as soon as possible.

Meanwhile, Chief Legislator Patrick Kahn shared that as part of the effectiveness of the resolution, balances will be disseminated on a regular basis.

 

Frank Santiago

By Frank Santiago

Iliana Tan

By Iliana Tan

18 replies on “USG discloses standing balances of different units”

If we want transparency, why are we so afraid of showing our funds? Yes, sure the funds are outdated but it CLEARLY states that “As of March 3”. So if both offices (OVPIA and SEG) have already paid their dues, then why not release a statement clarifying the issue. As it is clearly seen in the USG page, they do not anymore have debts then why are they worried?

I suggest the USG release a year end report before the current officers end their terms.

Motives? Maybe there was motive in releasing the pub. It was timely. But, we do want to know how our future leaders will be able to run the school, right? So, yes it may be politically motivated but I see nothing wrong with that. If you do not have anything to hide, you should not be worried, OVPIA and SEG.

i don’t think they were worried at all. just think about it — what if YOU were leading the OVPIA, and you were running for president in the GE. then a suspicious, outdated pub was released stating OVPIA has a 100k+ deficit incurred during your stay as the office’s head; but the truth was your office actually has over 400k+ budget. how would YOU feel?

Thank you for your reply, smhpeople.

The LA resolution states that they should release funds 14 days after it was approved ( Feb 23). They were just following the rules. Why did they release at this time when the current OVPIA is running for USG president? I would like to give our USG officers the benefit of the doubt that there is not color in doing so. They were doing it for transparency purposes. As for the date, they decided to release the LATEST numbers. My opinion is that they gave ample time for these said offices to transact properly and not wait for the last minute to do so. Furthermore, they will issue another statement for a more updated data.

I do however concede that it would make me feel bad but not guilty. OVPIA has already released a statement and that is enough for now.

both Santugon and Tapat is BS. No help to the university at all. What achievements are they even talking about? is it the positions they got wherein they didn’t do anything? positions where they made activities that only includes partying? The comment from the past article was right, “USG makes activities and events pero sila sila din naman umaattend.” such BS

You say that the USG is all about planing parties and that they don’t do anything? How about Animosys? Grievance? Adjustment? Course Projection? Charging Stations? Sportsfests? Univ Week? They talk to the admin about the rules and regulations and the multiple compromises they can make to help the students with their school life. It’s clear you haven’t been looking carefully and observing what the USG actually does. And be sure your referring to the USG when you say they plan parties, or are you referring to the CSO? Because the USG rarely organizes parties.

Ang bobo naman talaga ng Tapat and Santugon , blockmates and classmates forcing you to vote for them and or not support the GE because they want a failure of elections

Leave a Reply